Google’s search results are undergoing one of their most radical transformations ever, as a new “Search Plus Your World” format began rolling out on January 10th. It finds both content that’s been shared with you privately, along with matches from the public web, all mixed into a single set of listings. When logged in to Google.com, users will see their personalized results displayed more prominently, and in higher concentration, than Google’s previous personalized/social search results. The release is already stirring up great controversy, accusing Google of showing bias to content found within its own social network, Google+. Google claims that it is not displaying content from Facebook/Twitter/Flickr because each has not granted Google API access. In any event, Google is definitely showing bias to content within Google+, making Google+ more important than ever. From a SEO perspective, it is as relevant now as it ever was. The ever-evolving mix of Search and Social, however, just took a significant leap forward. A brand’s level of social engagement now plays a more significant role in organic search than it once did. A brand that is not engaging socially, or has ignored social integration within its site, is now at a major disadvantage from an organic search perspective – or, should we say, from a digital marketing perspective.

You are going to start to see this symbol ,  next to results that are personally relevant to you. Other results are assumed global/public web results.

You are defaulted into seeing personalized results, but can choose to see only global/public results as well.

To summarize, personalized results include:

  • Listings from the web
  • Listings from the web, boosted because of your personal behavior
  • Listings from the web, boosted because of your social connections
  • Public Google+ posts, photos or Google Picasa photos (all of which are also listings from the web)
  • Private or “Limited” Google+ posts, photos or Google Picasa photos shared with you

Controversy | Privacy and Google Bias

This is already creating controversy, most of which are misconceptions, or can be explained.

Privacy - People are seeing their own personal/private results in what appears to be public (private photos, posts, etc.). Google now has access to your content, but only because you are logged in.  Really, this content is not visible to the public web.

Google Bias – Many are accusing Google of favoring its own content over other equally or more relevant content.  Much of the social integration appears to be favoring Google+ content.  Really, Google is showing content from Google+, but mostly because Facebook and Twitter will not (have not) opened the flood gates to their platforms. Google wants to show Facebook/Twitter/Flickr in “Search plus Your World,” but claims it can’t until each social network authorizes access. Twitter/Facebook/Flickr post too much content (not to mention behind log-ins), making it hard for Google to adequately crawl in real-time. It needs the API.

Read More:

What is it?
http://searchengineland.com/googles-results-get-more-personal-with-search-plus-your-world-107285

People claiming Google to unjustly promote itself in search, not other social platforms
http://searchengineland.com/search-engines-should-be-like-santa-107400

**Google claims, not favoring its own results… and is happy to talk to Twitter and Facebook about Integration
http://marketingland.com/schmidt-google-not-favored-happy-to-talk-twitter-facebook-integration-3151

How | a Practical Applications | Clarification from Matt Cutts
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-plus-your-world/

High level, how it affects SEO (a couple of points could be pulled from this article)
http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2012/01/how-google-plus-your-world-will-impact-seo.html

Why Google+ is now essential (at least for now) for all brands — some great points in this article
http://searchengineland.com/examples-google-search-plus-drive-facebook-twitter-crazy-107554

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 0 comments }

I’m an admitted Disney fan, so I was naturally psyched to see the upcoming re-release of Beauty and the Beast in 3D. I promptly liked the Beauty and the Beast Facebook page and have enjoyed seeing behind-the-scenes nuggets, pictures and trailers scroll through my News Feed these past few months in preparation for the January 13th release date. Obviously, Disney has other film projects in the works, most notably, their new Pixar collaboration, Brave, a tale about a (wait for it) brave Celtic princess.

Disney is a massive brand, with fan pages for each of their titles, theme parks, subsidiaries and more. So it makes sense that some cross-promotion takes place – heck, it’s a no-brainer. But I was surprised to see a bit of clever tagging on a post the other day:

Posting a picture from the movie, the Beauty and the Beast fan page captioned the photo with a cutesy warm fuzzy about bravery and fate. But soft, what tag through yonder update breaks?! They cleverly inserted the title of their new Pixar movie, tagging it and leading fans to Brave‘s own Facebook page.

I paused at this. Clever? Or spammy? Sure, it’s all Disney, but do I want a Beauty and the Beast experience divorced of other Disney properties? Or do I want to see how this movie fits with the overall Disney brand experience? I asked the office here at Sitewire and received some interesting responses, of which I’ve included some snippets:

I don’t see an issue as long as you’re cross-promoting within your own brand. -Sandy Catour

Sneaky sneaky…BUT I love it!! Pretty smart if you ask me :) -Paige Dell’Armi

I’ve seen a lot of things from Disney sort of uniting the common thread between their heroines. For any other brand, I might say that this is spammy cross-promotion that takes advantage of the tagging functionality. For Disney, it’s furthering a message that has been integral to them for years, while at the same time showing that they still produce films that instill the same values in young girls. -Emily Voris

So, seems like most people liked the idea, but recognized that it walks a fine line, and, perhaps, it’s only okay because Disney did it. But maybe it’s not so much the fact that cross-promotional tagging took place, but how it was used. For example, instead of working the tag into a sentence (which, by the way, is not a quote from Beauty and the Beast – might have been different if it was), why couldn’t they have been a bit more transparent? What if they had captioned the photo differently?

Belle is a strong and independent character. And in keeping with Disney’s long line of inspirational heroines, Disney brings audiences Merida, a Celtic princess who makes her feature film debut in this summer’s Brave.

Regardless, it’s fun to see brands experimenting with Facebook’s functionality. And I’m psyched for both Beauty and the Beast in 3D and Brave.

What are your thoughts? Are there rules to cross-promotional tagging on Facebook? Let us know in the comments!

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 7 comments }

Are Google+ Pages for Business Right for Your Brand?

by Travis Unwin November 9, 2011

Google+ Pages present a new opportunity for brands to be represented and interact with their audience in social media. For brands with a social presence — or who would like one — Sitewire strongly recommends Google+ Pages as a next step in improving visibility online. Do I need a Google+ Page if I already have [...]

Read the full article →

Search Engine Rankings and Click-Through Rates: Be Not Deceived

by Roger Pimentel October 3, 2011

A new graph has been making its way around the social media circles, part of an excellent white paper about long-tail CTR. While the piece was shared by some very smart people in the industry, and people that I have a lot of respect for, this kind of report makes me cringe because its implications [...]

Read the full article →

Early evaluation of the marketing impact of Google+

by Travis Unwin June 30, 2011

Two days ago, the buzz on the internet was all about Google+. (No, not Google +1. Drop the numeral and remove a space. How’s that for clarity of branding?) A handful of techno-nerds had their hands on it for a while, telling us that Google was finally making a solid push for the social space. [...]

Read the full article →

ICANN Releasing New Generic Top Level Domains

by Travis Unwin June 20, 2011

After years of deliberation and discussion, ICANN, The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, voted to launch an initiative that will effectively allow for an unlimited number of Top Level Domains, or TLDs. As of right now, 22 TLDs exist — with .com, .net and .org the most recognizable — as well as nearly [...]

Read the full article →